Agency vs. Stewardship Theory in Operational Risk Management: A Comparative Panel Data Analysis of Family and Non-Family Firm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24905/icobis.v2i1.21Keywords:
EBITDA Volatility, Family Firm, Institutional Ownership, Operational Risk, Socioemotional WealthAbstract
This study examines the asymmetric impacts of financial determinants—Growth Opportunity, Operating Cash Flow, Liquidity, and Leverage on operational risk (EBITDA volatility), and analyzes the moderating role of Institutional Ownership across different governance structures. Investigating 36 companies within the Consumer Non Cyclicals sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Main Board for the 2021–2025 period, the study executes a multi level analysis combining an aggregate market baseline (180 observations) with an asymmetrical split sample approach separating family firms (30 firms, 150 observations) and non family firms (6 firms, 30 observations) using the Random Effects Model with Robust Standard Errors. The findings reveal that aggregate baseline models obscure critical structural realities. In the aggregate market and non family firms, institutional ownership acts as an effective external monitoring mechanism that mitigates expansion driven risks, providing strong validation for Agency Theory. Conversely, in family firms governed by Stewardship values and Socioemotional Wealth, aggressive growth and internal cash retention heighten operational volatility. Furthermore, while leverage acts as a crucial internal disciplinary anchor in family firms, heavy institutional monitoring disrupts their informal governance networks, creating strategic friction that significantly amplifies EBITDA volatility. The study concludes that the transmission channels of financial determinants in mitigating operational risk are highly conditional upon the underlying ownership architecture, highlighting the necessity of integrating sociological dimensions into corporate financial risk assessments.
References
Amore, M. D., & Minichilli, A. (2023). Informal governance and strategic decision making in family firms. Journal of
Corporate Finance, 78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102341
Al Hakim, I., Utami, Y., & Arridho Nur Amin, M. (2026). Determinants of Debt Financing Behavior in Indonesian Family
Firms: The Moderating Role of Family Tribe’s Social Capital (Vol. 33, Number 1).
Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., & Jimenez, D. (2022). Corporate governance in family firms: The role of socioemotional wealth.
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12411
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, A. W. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual
issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00049.x Theory and Practice, 28(4),
–354.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of
Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Frame, W. S., McLemore, P., & Mihov, A. (2020). Haste Makes Waste: Banking Organization Growth and Operational
Risk. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers, 2020(2023). https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2023
Gamba, A., & Triantis, A. J. (2020). Corporate Risk Management: Integrating Liquidity, Hedging, and Operating Policies.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1475154Electroniccopyavailableat:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1475154
Hendi, & Wulandari, W. (2023). Pengaruh CSR, Growth, Profitability, Firm Size, Financial Leverage Terhadap Risiko Operasional.
Jurnal Ekuilnomi, 5(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.36985/ekuilnomi.v5i2.733
Jbara, W. (2024). The Impact Of Cash Flow Classification On Financial Risk Assessment-A Study Applied To Industrial Firms
Listed On The Stock Exchanges Of Palestine, Amman, And Gulf Cooperation Council Countries For The Period 2018-2022.
An-Najah National University.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.
Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jiang, F., & Li, Y. (2023). Socioemotional wealth and family firm conflict: A meta analytic approach. Journal of Business
Research, 154, 113350.
Kandel, A., Karki, A., & Dahal, A. (2024). Determinants of Capital Structure: A Case of Nepalese Non-Financial Firms.
In Nepalese Journal of Economics.
Mahaputra, I. N. K. A., Sudiartana, I. M., Bagiana, I. K., Primadona, I. A. L., & Murti, N. P. M. A. (2024). Pengaruh Tata
Kelola Perusahaan terhadap Pengungkapan Manajemen Risiko: Peran Moderasi Komite Pemantau Risiko. Jurnal
Ekonomi Bisnis, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi (Jebma), 4(3), 1281–1291.
Ofori, B. S., Padi, A., & Musah, A. (2025). Corporate Governance Effectiveness, Operational Risk And Financial
Performance Of Banks: The Role Of Firm Size. Economics - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 13(2), 71–93.
https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0031
Pane, A. A., & Rahmadhani, S. N. (2021). Pengaruh Struktur Modal Dan Volatilitas Laba terhadap Kualitas Laba PT.
Bank Sumut. JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS : Jurnal Program Studi Akuntansi, 7(1), 81–89.
https://doi.org/10.31289/jab.v7i1.4476
Rovelli, P., Ferasso, M., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2022). Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo
and future directions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100497
